Truth Discovery and Crowdsourcing Aggregation: A Unified Perspective
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the era of Big Data, data entries, even describing the same objects or events, can come from a variety of sources, where a data source can be a web page, a database or a person. Consequently, conflicts among sources become inevitable. To resolve the conflicts and achieve high quality data, truth discovery and crowdsourcing aggregation have been studied intensively. However, although these two topics have a lot in common, they are studied separately and are applied to different domains. To answer the need of a systematic introduction and comparison of the two topics, we present an organized picture on truth discovery and crowdsourcing aggregation in this tutorial. They are compared on both theory and application levels, and their related areas as well as open questions are discussed.
منابع مشابه
Quality Enhancement by Weighted Rank Aggregation of Crowd Opinion
Expertise of annotators has a major role in crowdsourcing based opinion aggregation models. In such frameworks, accuracy and biasness of annotators are occasionally taken as important features and based on them priority of the annotators are assigned. But instead of relying on a single feature, multiple features can be considered and separate rankings can be produced to judge the annotators pro...
متن کاملEvaluating Crowdsourcing Participants in the Absence of Ground-Truth
Data can be acquired, shared, and processed by an increasingly larger number of entities, in particular people. The distributed nature of this phenomenon has contributed to the development of many crowdsourcing projects. This scenario is prevalent in most forms of expert/non-expert group opinion and rating tasks (including many forms of internet or on-line user behavior), where a key element is...
متن کاملMulti-Label Annotation Aggregation in Crowdsourcing
As a means of human-based computation, crowdsourcing has been widely used to annotate large-scale unlabeled datasets. One of the obvious challenges is how to aggregate these possibly noisy labels provided by a set of heterogeneous annotators. Another challenge stems from the difficulty in evaluating the annotator reliability without even knowing the ground truth, which can be used to build ince...
متن کاملExploring Relevance as Truth Criterion on the Web and Classifying Claims in Belief Levels
The Web has become the most important information source for most of us. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee for the correctness of information on the Web. Moreover, different websites often provide conflicting information on a subject. Several truth discovery methods have been proposed for various scenarios, and they have been successfully applied in diverse application domains. In this paper...
متن کاملMulticategory Crowdsourcing Accounting for Plurality in Worker Skill and Intention, Task Difficulty, and Task Heterogeneity
Crowdsourcing allows to instantly recruit workers on the web to annotate image, web page, or document databases. However, worker unreliability prevents taking a worker’s responses at “face value”. Thus, responses from multiple workers are typically aggregated to more reliably infer ground-truth answers. We study two approaches for crowd aggregation on multicategory answer spaces: stochastic mod...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- PVLDB
دوره 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015